<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Begins At Home - Latest Comments in To twitter or not to twitter</title><link>http://marketingbeginsathome.disqus.com/</link><description>Social Media and Public Relations Ideas and Insights From David Parmet</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:19:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: To twitter or not to twitter</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/#comment-4680059</link><description>David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Firstly, thanks for recognizing that I'm a big boy although it is something my Mum has been telling me a number of years now .  But I'll confess, I'm a little taken aback by your response to me querying the potential value of Twitter.  Maybe you were having a bad day.  Please take the time to read the post again and you may conclude (as Tom does) that I'm asking a simple question - I'm not 'getting' Twitter so can people help me 'get' it.  And I'm not, as you assert, trivialising the issue in any way.  Lastly, I always thought sloppy writing and mis-spelling was more likely to be the the death of our industry rather than questioning which new communications channels may make it or not...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clive</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clive Armitage</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:19:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: To twitter or not to twitter</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/#comment-4680058</link><description>Clive's a big boy - and I for one have heard way too many PR people (and worse, agency heads) say things like "I don't get it" and dismiss things like blogging or podcasting out of hand. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just because a particular form of communications might seem trivial to you, doesn't mean it's trivial. That attitude is going to be the death of our industry...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Parmet</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:49:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: To twitter or not to twitter</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/#comment-4680057</link><description>David,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to say I'm surprised and a little disapointed with this post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To call someone out for expressing an opinion, or asking why this stuff is so important, is a little harsh IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clive is asking the question - getting into the conversation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you were a little rash.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tom</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:41:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: To twitter or not to twitter</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/#comment-4680060</link><description>Good call David! Heh, "To Twitter or not to twitter". I like that. Blogging last week I then realized the post I was writing was short and personal, completely deserving of a  twitter. I said to myself... "better twitter this" -- then thought it was completely hilarious that the word twitter is now used as a verb in direct conjunction with the beloved Twitter service. Now I can "twitter" my "internet friends" even from my "cell phone". So many things are coming together-- its like a revelation! Haha!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:51:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>