<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Begins At Home - Latest Comments in The network that ate its young</title><link>http://marketingbeginsathome.disqus.com/</link><description>Social Media and Public Relations Ideas and Insights From David Parmet</description><atom:link href="https://marketingbeginsathome.disqus.com/the_network_that_ate_its_young/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:01:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The network that ate its young</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2005/12/03/the-network-that-ate-its-young/#comment-4679365</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I have to state upfront I have been a critic of the AAR operation's business model from Day One, I have to agree with you about the idiocy of breaking up Morning Sedition for a game plan that is almost pre-ordained to draw even crappier ratings for their morning drive time slot. As you noted in the post, morning radio in NYC is pretty bare, entertainment-wise. Until Kuby reaches across the table and throttles Sliwa, I can't stomach more than small dosages of WABC. Even when Maron had launched himself to the moon on a lunatic tirade, the man always delivered entertainment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Goldberg should have stuck to records.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC_LeatherPenguin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:01:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>