<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Begins At Home - Latest Comments in oops!</title><link>http://marketingbeginsathome.disqus.com/</link><description>Social Media and Public Relations Ideas and Insights From David Parmet</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 12:45:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: oops!</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2006/05/05/oops/#comment-4679681</link><description>Well, part of the bigger problem is the pitch itself is bad. It says nothing much, but takes a &lt;b&gt;long&lt;/b&gt; time saying nothing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, customers are customers. Users are users. Consumers - her bad word choice - are people we just take money from and don't listen to. One thing I can say about blogging and reaching out to bloggers is that it has changed my pitch letter - which tend to be bullet points and short. I save the long stuff for my blog. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the cluetrain reference in his post, nice to talk the talk (which in a 30-second bit on the book means just use common sense), but you can't claim you're a small outfit that's just seven people (very Web 2.0 to be small, natch) when you go out and hire a PR firm that is more than just one consultant. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and there are no major funding announcements in Web 2.0 - that's a relic of the dotcom era.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Pepper</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 12:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: oops!</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2006/05/05/oops/#comment-4679680</link><description>This is actually somewhat on point and is good advice. As the sheepish CEO behind Tabblo, &lt;a href="http://theonda.org/articles/2006/05/06/the-cluetrain-does-stop-at-tabblo-station" rel="nofollow"&gt;my response&lt;/a&gt; may be interesting to you. One thing though: I am not sure what Kerry "bigger problem" is. We're all rowing in the same boat here, and learning from posts like yours is one of the things we'll do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Antonio Rodriguez</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 11:52:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: oops!</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2006/05/05/oops/#comment-4679679</link><description>...or perhaps she knew exactly what she was doing and was hoping for all this extra, free publicity.  Like you said... who needs another photo-sharing site, right?  Well... news like this might just get buried... unless, of course, it was attached to a "scandal"... right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Food for thought.  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 10:48:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: oops!</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2006/05/05/oops/#comment-4679678</link><description>Mike: Nifty site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David: I'm making a habit of publishing pre-embargo press releases to fight just that. (And because it's fun.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Douglas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 10:31:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: oops!</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2006/05/05/oops/#comment-4679677</link><description>hey - valleywag forgot &lt;a href="http://www.esnips.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.esnips.com&lt;/a&gt; but i guess that's much more than a photo sharing site huh ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mike dunn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 06:53:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>