<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Begins At Home - Latest Comments in further evidence that PR and control are a bad mix</title><link>http://marketingbeginsathome.disqus.com/</link><description>Social Media and Public Relations Ideas and Insights From David Parmet</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 15:08:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: further evidence that PR and control are a bad mix</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2005/05/02/further-evidence-that-pr-and-control-are-a-bad-mix/#comment-4679091</link><description>Um, is PerfectMatch really on that many people's radars that that is going to hurt the PR firm or eHarmony? When I think of the 40-page questionnaire and competition for eHarmony, it's usually &lt;a href="http://True.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;True.com&lt;/a&gt; that I think of.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mountains out of mole hills, methinks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Pepper</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 15:08:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: further evidence that PR and control are a bad mix</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2005/05/02/further-evidence-that-pr-and-control-are-a-bad-mix/#comment-4679090</link><description>How ridiculous. It reminds me of an episode of the show Curb Your Enthusiasm where a newspaper really messes up an obituary. Just another example of why it pays to be detail oriented in the world of published media.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob S</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 13:11:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>