<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Begins At Home - Latest Comments in End of an error</title><link>http://marketingbeginsathome.disqus.com/</link><description>Social Media and Public Relations Ideas and Insights From David Parmet</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 07:17:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: End of an error</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2005/05/31/end-of-an-error/#comment-4679121</link><description>This is one of those things that still blows my mind about the internet... mention a publication and an editor shows up to discuss.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks Heath for stopping by. I appreciate the advice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 07:17:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End of an error</title><link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2005/05/31/end-of-an-error/#comment-4679120</link><description>Blog hits are surely easier to get than print hits, given the real estate in the magazine. But to be honest, it all depends on the quality of the pitch -- and whether the story you want to tell is a story that resonates with the magazine or periodical you're pitching. A phrase like "transformative enterprise software" doesn't ring any bells for me, really, because FC doesn't write about products or software that much. We write about leadership, innovation, and how people _work_. That's the spin we'd have looked for in your previous pitches. A low-tech tailor publishing a blog? That's an intriguing work culture concept.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Heath Row</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:25:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>